Moral issue
Ryan Hicks
Moral issue: Cheating
When tasked with a worksheet our subject
(not to be named) felt that the best way to get through the worksheet would be
to do it with a friend. This may be an action that would benefit both the
subject and his friend however when caught; the teacher decides to half the
mark of said students. This puts both
students in a perdiciment as the subject is left with what would still be
considered by many as a high A for a class grade, but his friends grade slipped
below to a mid B in the class. There are many ways the student could deal with
the reception of such a poor grade. However the way the said student chooses to
deal with the situation could impact the final mark of the student.. One looks
to philosophy for answers in time of need. The existentialistic way of dealing
with the situation would be to accept the low mark as it will not impact my
grade that much. The friend however would have his grade lowered but in this
philosophical view you have “no morals” and you are supposed to do what is best
for yourself. This is one outlet to look at taking however the subjects morals
are too strong to accept letting a close friend suffer for his mistake. Utilitarianism
means you are to do what is best for the most people for that is in your best
interest. The best way to apply this is to ask the teacher to give the subject
a zero and give the friend full marks. In this way the teacher gets to exact
punishment for what is considered as cheating, the student with the high A gets
to lower his grade a miniscule amount and the friend of the student who got a
very low mark on the worksheet will get a better mark on the worksheet and as a
result won’t pull down his class grade as much. This may not benefit the
subject but it does benefit more people in the end which is the concept behind
utilitarianism. This is the view that could be taken so that more people
benefit from an awkward situation and could help our subject out of his situation
No comments:
Post a Comment